I tweeted earlier that it’s going to take some time to get used to referring to the Apple Watch as an alternative of iWatch, and it appears I’m in good firm. As The Verge famous, even Tim Cook stated iWatch throughout his ABC News interview when speaking about US jobs created by the corporate.
Developers writing purposes for iPhone and iPad and Mac and now, in fact, as of at present, the iWatch
The query is, was the slip-up as a result of Cook spends an excessive amount of time studying tech websites, or was it that Apple initially meant to launch it because the iWatch, having a change of thoughts a way down the road?
you assume 'iTouch' is dangerous?
'iWatch' can be with us endlessly :/—
Seth Weintraub (@llsethj) September 09, 2014
iWatch was (and I assume nonetheless is) the apparent identify for the product. Apple Watch feels awkward as compared. As Mike Beasley observed, Apple Phone or Apple Tablet doesn’t have the identical ring as iPhone and iPad, so why not iWatch? It certainly can’t simply be that Apple was miffed that the tech press has been utilizing the time period so lengthy it felt it needed to show us flawed?
Filed beneath: AAPL Company, Apple Watch Tagged: ABC News, Apple, Apple watch, iPad, iPhone, iWatch, Steve Jobs, Tim Cook