Connect with us

Supreme Court sides with Samsung, sends Apple patent fight back to lower court

Apple News

Supreme Court sides with Samsung, sends Apple patent fight back to lower court

Supreme Court opens the door for Samsung to further reduce the damages against it.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that a statute applied to manufactured products was applied too narrowly in the company’s patent fight with Apple, leaving the door open to Samsung having the judgment against it reduced. While the company was originally ordered to pay $399 million to Apple, the court held that the damages could potentially be reduced because only certain components of the relevant devices might be infringing on Apple’s patents, rather than the whole of each device.

From the ruling:

In the case of a multicomponent product, the relevant “article of manufacture” for arriving at a §289 damages award need not be the end product sold to the consumer but may be only a component of that product.

“Article of manufacture” is defined as something made by hand or machine, and can refer both to a product sold, as well as a component of that product. The Supreme Court did not ma…

Supreme Court opens the door for Samsung to additional scale back the damages towards it.

The U.S. Supreme Court has dominated unanimously that a statute implemented to manufactured merchandise used to be implemented too narrowly within the corporate's patent fight with Apple, leaving the door open to Samsung having the judgment towards it decreased. Whilst the corporate used to be initially ordered to pay $399 million to Apple, the court held that the damages may just probably be lowered as a result of best sure parts of the related units may well be infringing on Apple's patents, somewhat than the entire of each and every tool.

From the ruling:

When it comes to a multicomponent product, the related "article of manufacture" for arriving at a §289 damages award don't need to be the top product bought to the shopper however could also be just a element of that product.

"Article of manufacture" is outlined as one thing made through hand or device, and will refer each to a product bought, in addition to an element of that product. The Supreme Court didn't come to a decision on what constituted an "article of manufacture" on this case, however they did rule that the lower Federal Court had implemented the statute too narrowly in its ruling.

The case now heads back to the Federal Circuit court for reconsideration.

That is simply the most recent in an extended collection of judicial showdowns between Apple and Samsung, which started in 2011 when Apple filed a patent infringement go well with towards its Korean rival. Apple gained the unique go well with, being awarded over $1 billion in damages. Over the years, that award has been decreased by way of more than a few courts as Samsung has fought its method during the U.S. criminal gadget.

Comments

More in Apple News

Popular

Featured

Advertisement
To Top